Argentine vaccine study claiming “55 undeclared chemical elements” in COVID jabs only partially correct, says Health Ranger: Some elements aren’t inherently toxic

A team of scientists from Argentina published a study in the International Journal of Vaccine Theory, Practice, and Research this week claiming that upwards of 55 chemical elements are hiding inside Wuhan coronavirus (COVID-19) “vaccines” from Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca, CanSino, Sinopharm and Sputnik – but are they all actually dangerous?

The Health Ranger released a video countering the claims made in the study, suggesting that the study is “a clown show of incompetence and errors” because of the way it suggests that all of the chemical elements are dangerous when some of them might not be harmful at all.

“I’m here to tell you as a published food scientist and laboratory owner … that I’ve frequently been disturbed by the fact that the public doesn’t know much about how laboratory science works or what is a chemical versus what is an element,” the Health Ranger explains in the video below.

“And I’ve seen many cases where people wildly overreact to things and they don’t understand what it really says, so I’m here to try to help you understand what this is. And right off the bat, the fact that this is being reported as ’55 undeclared chemical elements’ … these ‘chemicals’ are known to cause damage – that’s inaccurate. They’re not chemicals; they are elements.”

(Related: Did you know that life expectancy drops by 37 percent after a person gets injected with a COVID “vaccine?”)

Not all earth elements are dangerous – it just depends on how they’re combined to produce other chemicals

The study’s architects identified 11 heavy metals, including chromium, arsenic, nickel, aluminum, cobalt and copper, that are considered to be “systemic toxicants,” meaning they can cause cancer and / or organ damage, even at very low levels. They also found a number of rare earth minerals hiding inside COVID jabs, these including things like lanthanum, cerium and gadolinium.

The fact that these elements were found within the vials but were not labeled as such caused James Lyons-Weiler, PhD, a member of the journal’s editorial board who was not involved in the study, to issue a statement that this potentially “raises dual and multiplied concern for human health” because “individually, these chemicals are known to cause neurological, cardiovascular and immunological damage.”

“Together, their synergistic toxicity could exacerbate these risks far beyond what regulators and manufacturers have disclosed or studied,” he added.

The Health Ranger addressed this by explaining that individual elements all by themselves are not the same as combined elements, which can produce all sorts of other chemicals depending on what they are mixed with and at what levels.

“When you combine elements, you create, then, molecules or chemicals,” the Health Ranger explains in the above video. “I can create ascorbic acid, or vitamin C, by combining hydrogen, carbon and oxygen.”

“But you can also create poisons or toxins out of the same elements, so the fact that an element exists in something often does not automatically mean that it’s toxic – although there are certain elements that are widely considered to be toxic elements, also called heavy metals.”

The Health Ranger goes further in the video to explain his perspective on the presence of certain elements within COVID jab vials and what the data shows about their toxicity or lack thereof. He also provides a more in-depth critique of the study’s methodology later on in the segment, arguing that the paper was poorly put together using erroneous methods.

“All the math is off,” he says. “If you don’t have the right dilution factor,” referring to some of the testing methods used in the study, “then all your results are trash.”

More related news about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines can be found at Vaccines.news.

Sources for this article include:

ChildrensHealthDefense.org

Brighteon.com